NO FLUFF.NO FOG.JUST CONDITIONS.
FineInTheoryUS EDITION

THE DELETE TEST

MAKE THE PROBLEM
SMALLER FIRST.

Remove every Better-have. If the purpose still works, the complexity was applying for a job that did not exist.

WORKED EXAMPLE

Five people need to share appointments and notice double bookings.

Buy an AI scheduling platform with advanced permissions, analytics and external integrations.

AI scheduling platformadvanced analyticsexternal integrationsFive people see one current schedule and notice a clash before it reaches the customer.

MUST / SHOULD / BETTER

Ask what fails when each condition is removed

  1. MustAll five people see the current schedule.
  2. MustDouble bookings become visible.
  3. ShouldChanges can be traced if the risk justifies it.
  4. BetterAI proposes the ideal time. Delete: no current failure requires it.
  5. BetterManagement dashboard. Delete: no decision has been named.

ROUTE BEFORE PRODUCT

Try the answers in an unglamorous order

StopIs the work itself needed?

OrganizeChange sequence, owner or input.

Learn / HumanIs knowledge or judgment the obstacle?

ExistingCalendar, spreadsheet or manual process.

ToolIf the Musts still fail, compare here.

BEFORE

Seven desirable features and a product comparison.

AFTER

Two Musts, one shared calendar and a one-week test.

Thinking behind the method

Jobs to Be Done ↗GOV.UK Service Manual ↗Double Diamond ↗